Subject: Re: sorting ps output
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/05/2003 13:30:24
In article <20030305014408.K3346@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk>,
David Laight <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I like it, but what letter do you propose for listing all lwps on a process?
>Dunno, what did 's' stand for?
>How about 't' for Thread? or 'W' for lWp? 'f' for Full (for SYSV freaks)
t for thread sounds better to me than the current s. Choosing t, will free s