On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:18:46PM +0900, Noriyuki Soda wrote:

 > >> void *
 > >> memmem(const void *b1, const void *b2, size_t len1, size_t len2);
 > 
 > glibc already has memmem(), but the order of its arguments is
 > different as follows:
 > 
 > :        void *memmem(const void *haystack, size_t haystacklen,
 > :               const void *needle, size_t needlelen);

I personally have no problem with memmem(3) being included in libc, so long
as it is compatible with implementations of the same function in other systems.

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>