Subject: Re: Removing GNU tar and GNU cpio from src?
To: NetBSD Userlevel Technical Discussion List <email@example.com>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 01/25/2003 22:26:51
>> Pure, yes. Simple, no. Who gets to decide what counts as corrupt?
> Yes, actually it is very simple in this case. If the st_mtime value
> for the file changes from the time it was first opened to the time
> its "last" buffer was written to the backup then the backup is
> obviously corrupt.
That's one possible meaning for "corrupt" here.
Despite what you appear to be convinced of, it is not the only one; it
is not even the only useful one.
Since you are unlikely to be convinced of that, and I haven't seen
anyone else supporting that position, I see nothing to be gained from
elaborating. I'll be happy to do so off-list with anyone interested.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML firstname.lastname@example.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B