On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 21:40:33 +0100
Thomas Klausner <wiz@danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:

> Another goal is to have a shell that's in the base system.
> After all, why do we have three shells in the base system
> if everyone is using a packaged one instead?

A more specific question is... which is the reason of having two
bourne shells, ksh and sh?

Thanks

-- 
Julio Merino (http://jmmv.dyndns.org/) <jmmv@menta.net>