Subject: Re: NetBSD ld.elf_so vs FreeBSD vs Linux
To: Bang Jun-Young <>
From: Charles M. Hannum <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 09/26/2002 12:22:18
> In spite of performance improvements made recently, our ld.elf_so
> was slowest among them. Loading time of statically linked binary was
> also slowest with NetBSD.

If I were to hazard a guess, I'd say you have the causality wrong
here.  The fact that static executable startup is slower is likely a
kernel issue that will also affect (possibly even worse) dynamic