Subject: Re: exploit with memcpy()
To: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 07/02/2002 11:37:25
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 07:29:48PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> OTOH maybe stopping the stack being executable would be a better
> ploy for catching the effects of undersize onstack data buffers.
> (at least then you can only jump to code that exists in the
> program being executed.)
That is precisely one of the reasons I'm working on my signals changes.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>