Subject: Re: New cat(1) option (was: Re: Possible solution to toolchain/16963 - NBUILDJOBS/METALOG conflict)
To: David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk>
From: Mason Loring Bliss <mason@acheron.middleboro.ma.us>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 06/07/2002 18:47:08
--N3bfPQSQKXDL8QeD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 10:41:33PM +0100, David Laight wrote:

> Safer in the sence that the OS/FS will get O_APPEND right, but may not
> get flock() right :-) (am I too pessimistec here?)

FWIW, it's been pointed out to me that I should be using fcntl, and not
flock. I'll whip up a new patch to post presently.

--=20
Mason Loring Bliss   mason@acheron.middleboro.ma.us   Ewige Blumenkraft!
https://www.deadsexy.org/  awake ? sleep : random() & 2 ? dream : sleep;

--N3bfPQSQKXDL8QeD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9ATfsykMMY715wXIRAskOAJ0QALwmOzv9jB63y6iuhw/C0LqZ5ACfXFEt
4Mn3RAN2DcIppFWTpmYwjaI=
=BEWG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--N3bfPQSQKXDL8QeD--