Subject: Re: Modifications of standard headers for PECOFF
To: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Perry E. Metzger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/24/2002 14:28:55
Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 04:06:44PM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> > I don't think that answered his question. I think the question is why
> > should NetBSD's userland includes be modified for PEACE?
> Because he needs to be able to build PECOFF versions of some system
> libraries which will help interface to the in-kernel emulator.
That makes considerable sense. Myself, I think PEACE is a fairly
important project, and I'd like to see impediments to development lowered...
Perry E. Metzger firstname.lastname@example.org
NetBSD: The right OS for your embedded design. http://www.wasabisystems.com/