Subject: Re: bin/11047: newgrp is missing
To: Ben Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Rick Kelly <email@example.com>
Date: 04/25/2002 18:33:29
Ben Harris said:
>bin/11047 gives some suggestions. If nothing else, POSIX.2-1992 has it as
>part of the User Portability option, which we largely support.
The downside is this:
I was working as an admin in a Solaris shop. They had been using CVS for
software development. The suits decided to switch to a commercial alternative
that had it's group named embedded in the binary. I now had 50 developers
typing "newgrp" all day long. They didn't like it and I heard about it daily.
Rick Kelly firstname.lastname@example.org www.rmkhome.com