Subject: Re: correct "direction" of barriers in rc.d
To: NetBSD Userlevel Technical Discussion List <tech-userlevel@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Jason R Thorpe <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 03/20/2002 13:02:22
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:41:21PM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote:

 > (as for the order changes, well they'd better be innocuous or else there
 > are errors in the definitions of the dependencies in the first place!)

Precisely.  If the ordering changes do break things, it's because the
dependencies were not correctly specified in the first place.  That's
why I'm not worried about them too much :-)

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <>