Subject: Re: libc ieee math cleanup
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Simon Burge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/12/2002 13:54:13
Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> You don't need to / sizeof(char) there, because IIRC that's defined to
> always be 1.
Ah, right you are. I'll fix that...
> Also, why delete the optimized 68040 version?
The "optimized 68040 version" is the same as everyone else's C
And David Laight wrote:
> I haven't looked at the old defns for these routunes, but were they
> global before? If not the names need rather more '_' and all the 'weak'
> defintion. (Maybe ansi prototypes?)
I haven't touched the definition of these functions at all (except for
the different union in the nan/inf constants).
Of these, isinf() and isnan() are used by vfprintf.o, and do have
weak-symbol versions. I've ANSIfyied the functions themselves.
Simon Burge <email@example.com>
NetBSD CDs, Support and Service: http://www.wasabisystems.com/