Subject: Re: syntax ideas solicited
To: Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <email@example.com>
Date: 12/25/2001 20:36:53
> that also needlessly extends the "foul" syntax. otoh, stuffing an
> environment variable is easy enough, and already supported. hmm...i
> suppose that job_runqueue() could be changed check that a job was
> being actually started within $WITHIN seconds of its scheduled start
> time. picky people could set $WITHIN to 5, generous people could set
> it to 7200 (or 2h, or whatever) and the default would be 0 (meaning
> "who cares"). that seems easy enough.
...assuming a single setting (a single environment variable) is right
for all the cronjobs.
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen