Subject: Re: RFC: migration to a fully dynamically linked system
To: None <tech-userlevel@netbsd.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 12/21/2001 16:47:03
[ On , December 21, 2001 at 10:59:41 (-0800), cgd@broadcom.com wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: RFC: migration to a fully dynamically linked system
>
> It's actually worse than that.  it gets included in libc... and
> because of the inherent nature of the nsswitch code, the generic
> e.g. passwd routines have to reference _all_ of the back-end passwd
> routines.  Thinking about it, since those need to do nsswitch parsing
> etc., probably all of the _other_ stuff understood by nsswitch has to
> get pulled in as well.

That's why you want it to be pluggable at build time.  But then we
already have that, so I don't see what the problem is....

-- 
								Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;  <gwoods@acm.org>;  <g.a.woods@ieee.org>;  <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>