Subject: Re: HEADS UP: new curses in tree
To: Brett Lymn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jaromir Dolecek <email@example.com>
Date: 12/03/2001 23:11:44
Brett Lymn wrote:
> added a function that is a standard curses call. Due to what is,
> frankly, a very poor programming decision on the part of the people
> who wrote this part of vi they overlayed a curses function with their
> own. We are vulnerable to this problem with _any_ function added. I
> am sure you are not advocating a major bump for every function added.
I agree with you.
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> http://www.NetBSD.org/Ports/i386/ps2.html
-= Those who would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserve =-
-= neither liberty nor safety, and will lose both. -- Benjamin Franklin =-