Subject: Re: stdio FILE extension
To: James Chacon <>
From: Jason R Thorpe <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 10/19/2001 13:04:44
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 03:56:07PM -0400, James Chacon wrote:

 > Any even then reading these changes that would affect the apps ability
 > to compile, not run. The struct should still map to the same place in the ABI
 > with these changes.
 > Making stuff not compile is a lot less worrisome when it's stuff that's 
 > already violating specs.

I agree... 

So, really, I'd change _ub to be like this:

	union {
		struct __sbuf _ubu_ub;
		void *_ubu_intcookie;
	} _ub_u;

to really insure that we break compilation of apps that use _ub.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <>