Subject: Re: stdio FILE extension
To: Michael Richardson <email@example.com>
From: Jason R Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/16/2001 21:16:16
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:50:57PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> One thing that I'd like to see is a warning from LD if I wind up attempting
> ld -o foo foo.o -llibbar -llibc.so.13
> where libbar depends upon libc.so.12.
ELF has no way to do this -- I've already said why -- "libc.so.12" and
"libc.so.13" are DIFFERENT LIBRARIES as far as ELF is concerned.
> The reason *I* keep asking about the libc bump is because at some point we
> *will* have to do it. I'm not saying that it will be fun, or desireable, but
> the accumulated cruft will overcome the pain. Also, people doing certain
> restricted environments (where they do not have any dependancies) may like to
> get rid of the cruft.
No, I don't believe we will HAVE to do it.
Note we are not the only system to note this problem/issue -- Solaris has
had the same libc major number for ... a very long time, and uses a renaming
scheme similar to the one we use in its libc.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>