On 23 Sep 2001 16:05:09 -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> 	- there are fields that we don't need/don't have (run levels,
> 	  entry type, exit codes, pid)

As others have mentioned, this is not a bug.  Some of those fields are
useful.

> 	- the accessor routines are not re-entrant.

So?

> 	- they still expose the guts of the structures so they might
> 	  need utmpxx in the future.

Actually, they don't.  They expose a structure used by the library API,
which may or may not be what's actually stored in the file.  If the
library API were to change, there's always #rename.