Subject: Re: utmp file format change
To: Johan Danielsson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: James Graham <email@example.com>
Date: 08/22/2001 13:09:02
On 22 Aug 2001, Johan Danielsson wrote:
# Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
# > the approach I like the best is the openbsd one, with a bit of clever
# > backward compat code in last(1) and other tools. any comments?
# Are there good reasons for keeping a binary format?
Well, fixed-length records are easier to deal with -- having to deal
with RLL or terminated strings just adds overhead. Okay, it's minimal,
given the speeds of today's machines, but the availibility of processing
power &c. does not justify such an approach (program for efficiency,
don't assume that the hardware will take up the slack), especially
considering we do not just run on today's machines.
NetBSD: The free OS with a money back guarantee!