Subject: Re: cp(1) vs. UVM/UBC
To: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 07/22/2001 15:43:32
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 05:16:58PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
> My point was that, regardless of what cp(1) uses, filesystems which can
> panic the system or break processes [where mmap(2) is broken under UBC] need
> to make mmap fail in those cases until the problems can be fixed.
There is no way to make the mmap(2) call fail in those cases.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>