Subject: Re: cp(1) vs. UVM/UBC
To: Todd Vierling <>
From: Jason R Thorpe <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 07/22/2001 15:43:32
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 05:16:58PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:

 > My point was that, regardless of what cp(1) uses, filesystems which can
 > panic the system or break processes [where mmap(2) is broken under UBC] need
 > to make mmap fail in those cases until the problems can be fixed.

There is no way to make the mmap(2) call fail in those cases.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <>