Subject: Re: cp(1) vs. UVM/UBC
To: None <>
From: Matthias Scheler <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 07/18/2001 18:37:54
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 09:05:01AM -0700, Jason R. Thorpe wrote:
>  > So turning that option on would break "cp" on LFS. How fatal would that
>  > be? Is LFS usable at the moment despite the mmap() problem?
> Somewhat usable, yes.  Let's wait to flip the switch until LFS
> is fixed.

I've submitted a change request in PR bin/13502 which says that it
should be turned on after LFS and NTFS are fixed.

	Kind regards

Matthias Scheler