Subject: Re: cp(1) vs. UVM/UBC
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Matthias Scheler <email@example.com>
Date: 07/18/2001 18:37:54
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 09:05:01AM -0700, Jason R. Thorpe wrote:
> > So turning that option on would break "cp" on LFS. How fatal would that
> > be? Is LFS usable at the moment despite the mmap() problem?
> Somewhat usable, yes. Let's wait to flip the switch until LFS
> is fixed.
I've submitted a change request in PR bin/13502 which says that it
should be turned on after LFS and NTFS are fixed.
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/