Subject: Re: cp(1) vs. UVM/UBC
To: Jason R Thorpe , Matthias Scheler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Andrew Brown <email@example.com>
Date: 07/18/2001 12:16:32
> > So turning that option on would break "cp" on LFS. How fatal would that
> > be? Is LFS usable at the moment despite the mmap() problem?
>Somewhat usable, yes. Let's wait to flip the switch until LFS
would there be any point to looking at the output of fstatfs() after
the open() to decide a code path?
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
firstname.lastname@example.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
email@example.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
firstname.lastname@example.org * "information is power -- share the wealth."