Subject: Re: cp(1) vs. UVM/UBC
To: Jason R Thorpe , Matthias Scheler <>
From: Andrew Brown <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 07/18/2001 12:16:32
> > So turning that option on would break "cp" on LFS. How fatal would that
> > be? Is LFS usable at the moment despite the mmap() problem?
>Somewhat usable, yes.  Let's wait to flip the switch until LFS
>is fixed.

would there be any point to looking at the output of fstatfs() after
the open() to decide a code path?

|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|             * "ah!  i see you have the internet (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"       * "information is power -- share the wealth."