Subject: Re: "tcpdchk" doesn't know that "sshd" uses tcp wrappers
To: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 06/30/2001 02:59:04
>"tcpdchk" reports (disingenuously) that "sshd" is not in
>"/etc/inetd.conf", when of course, that's not the issue, as "sshd"
>does use tcp wrappers.
>It appears to be a trivial thing to give "sshd" the same treatment
>as "sendmail". Does anyone object to my committing the following?
i guess it reasonable, but how many services do we need to list here?