"tcpdchk" reports (disingenuously) that "sshd" is not in
"/etc/inetd.conf", when of course, that's not the issue, as "sshd"
does use tcp wrappers.

It appears to be a trivial thing to give "sshd" the same treatment
as "sendmail". Does anyone object to my committing the following?


Frederick

Index: inetcf.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/basesrc/usr.sbin/tcpdchk/inetcf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -c -r1.5 inetcf.c
*** inetcf.c	1999/08/27 16:07:23	1.5
--- inetcf.c	2001/06/29 16:55:47
***************
*** 40,46 ****
    * The last entry should be a NULL.
    */
  char   *uses_libwrap[] = {
!     "tcp", "/usr/sbin/sendmail", "sendmail",
      (char *) NULL
  };

--- 40,47 ----
    * The last entry should be a NULL.
    */
  char   *uses_libwrap[] = {
!     "tcp", "/usr/sbin/sendmail",	"sendmail",
!     "tcp", "/usr/sbin/sshd",		"sshd",
      (char *) NULL
  };