Subject: Re: cron syslogs
To: Assar Westerlund <email@example.com>
From: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/15/2001 10:47:51
On 15 May 2001, Assar Westerlund wrote:
# Date: 15 May 2001 14:12:15 +0200
# From: Assar Westerlund <email@example.com>
# To: Johan Danielsson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
# Cc: email@example.com
# Subject: Re: cron syslogs
# firstname.lastname@example.org (Johan Danielsson) writes:
# > The easiest way out is to more or less s/ProgramName/getprogname()/,
# > but it also changes the name to uppercase for subprocesses, which
# > would get lost with that change.
# /* mark ourselves as different to PS command watchers by upshifting
# * our program name. This has no effect on some kernels.
# I assume that means it's there not to trick programs counting the
# number of running crons, or trying to kill them. But perhaps Paul
# knews better? I would say remove it.
I'd say keep it. It means that if you have large amounts of cron-babies,
you can just kill them wholesale instead of trying to guess which one
is mama and avoiding that one.
Sorry for the graphic detail and/or choice of aphorisms -- I'm in a
hurry, and it was the best way I could think to explain them.
*BSD: SIMMs Like Good Code.