Subject: Re: chmod on symlink Q
To: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 04/26/2001 01:04:38
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> I would have thought so, too, but this is what it says in the man page
> for 1.5.1_BETA...
> If the option -h is not given, unless the -H or -L option is set,
> chmod on a symbolic link always succeeds and has no effect.
Uhu... May I say that from a users POV this just sucks?
It's not intuitive and what I expect from other OSs (checked Solaris 7).
Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>