Subject: Re: ^T for fsck
To: Michael Richardson <email@example.com>
From: Assar Westerlund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/05/2001 13:24:57
Michael Richardson <email@example.com> writes:
> Should it perhaps say "fsck" in front of every line?
> Consider connecting up to a serial console (e.g. no previous history my
> screen) and hitting ^T...
Since the kernel output for SIGINFO is not disabled it still says it's
fsck. Typical output will look something like:
load: 0.42 cmd: fsck_ffs 29214 [physio] 0.03u 0.02s 0% 496k
/dev/rvnd0c: phase 1: cyl group 4 of 7 (57%)
> Should they really go to stdout rather than stderr?
Since all other output from fsck goes to stdout, I think that's