Subject: Re: /dev/stdout wierdness
To: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 03/01/2001 14:29:01
Yeah, this is basically just centered on fdesc doing the wrong thing.
Anything else should get it's own thread :-)
>On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Jaromír Dolecek wrote:
>> Jaromír Dolecek wrote:
>> > I think the code in fdesc_open() for Fdesc case should mask off
>> > all flags other than O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY and O_RDWR. Note that currently,
>> > it does not change them at all.
>> Also one cosmetic - sys_fhopen() should call VOP_OPEN() _before_
>> it checks O_TRUNC.
>Why? sys_fhopen follows the exact same procedure as vn_open(), just w/o
>the namei() calls & setup.
>The desire was that fhopen(2) acted EXACTLY like open(2) except that (1)
>the file had to exist (O_CREAT makes no sense), and 2) you passed in a
>filehandle rather than a path. While I came into this discussion late, I
>haven't seen a reason why we should change sys_fhopen().
>If we change vn_open(), then yes we should also change sys_fhopen(). But I
>thought the discussion was talking about the fdesc filesystem instead. :-)