Subject: Re: changes to top to print wchan for sleeping procs
To: Laine Stump <email@example.com>
From: Jason R Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/17/2001 17:44:45
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 06:07:57PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com> writes:
> > Well, keep the "state" column to make the "sleep" obvious, and add a
> > "wchan" column.
> That adds 8 columns (or so) which either makes the display > 80
> columns (which is a definite no-no, since many people run top on text
> displays), or necessitates removal of other useful information (and
> I'm sure we'd get complaints about that too).
I think Hubert wants to get rid of WCPU -- but I totally support keeping
the WCPU column, and simply doing the CAPS/nocaps thing for STATE versus
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>