On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, enami tsugutomo wrote:
> Here is my local mod to top(1) to print wchan for sleeping process.
> Some of us also likes this change.  So, I'd like to commit this.  Is
> there any objection or thoughts?  Especially, is it better to have a
...
>   PID USERNAME PRI NICE   SIZE   RES STATE      TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
> 21958 enami     10    0   748K 1232K wait       0:00  0.67%  0.24% bash
>     4 root      18    0     0K   24M syncer    16:19  0.15%  0.15% ioflush
> 21957 root       2    0   268K 1380K select     0:00  0.22%  0.10% sshd
>   284 enami      2    0  8200K 9520K select    56:17  0.00%  0.00% XFree86
> 11117 enami     36    4    20M    4K stop      22:14  0.00%  0.00% <emacs>
> 23502 enami      2    0   712K    4K select     7:28  0.00%  0.00% <slogin>
>  2863 enami     28    0  1820K    4K stop       3:44  0.00%  0.00% <w3m>
>   287 enami      2    0   396K    4K select     1:23  0.00%  0.00% <kterm>
>   166 root       2    0    48K  348K nfsd       1:02  0.00%  0.00% nfsd

I think it's confusing as see seem to have a whole bunch of new CPU states
now. replacing wchan in favour of wchan, and leaving the old state avoids
this.


 - Hubert

-- 
Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>