Subject: Re: Removing cvs from basesrc.
To: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
From: Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/10/2000 11:24:02
>: If we're going to remote ANYTHING from basesrc, it probably ought to be
>: RCS -- CVS no longer requires it, and most people use CVS for version
>: controlling these days.
>I agree on RCS as well, and have proposed it before, meeting the response of
>"well, we don't have a pkgized base system, so buzz off." However,
>technical arguments like these certainly weigh better.
there are probably lots of things that meet this description. all the
games, for example.
fwiw, i use rcs all the time, and cvs almost never, hence, i am
opposed to the idea of removing rcs from basesrc. when working in a
small group, rcs is fine. removing both source code revision control
systems from basesrc would be bad.
i guess i wouldn't mind so much if someone wrote wrapper scripts for
cvs that emulated the rcs commands. :)
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
email@example.com * "ah! i see you have the internet
firstname.lastname@example.org (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
email@example.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."