In <20001125072028.22C5E3668@203.141.135.11.user.am.il24.net>
minoura@netbsd.org wrote:

> So, what's the result?  The current status is TOO BAD to
> cause error in make build, even though it does not stop the
> build.
> PLEASE CORRECT IT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.  Reverting the change
> is acceptable for temporary workaround until the right
> solution is out.

(sorry I'm not on tech-userlevel, but shouldn't we move to tech-toolchain?)

How about the attached diff? I believe it's simple and common way.

BTW, I think we should also handle this on making termcap.db etc.
IMHO, it is better to prepare a common variable in bsd.own.mk.
pwd_mkdb and cap_mkdb have different options.
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/basesrc/etc/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.170
diff -u -r1.170 Makefile
--- Makefile	2000/11/09 20:01:54	1.170
+++ Makefile	2000/11/26 01:17:59
@@ -120,18 +120,22 @@
 
 # find out endianness of target and set proper flag for pwd_mkdb so that
 # it creates database in same endianness
-.if exists(${DESTDIR}/usr/include/machine/endian_machdep.h)
-TARGET_ENDIANNESS!= awk '/_BYTE_ORDER/{print $$3}' \
-       ${DESTDIR}/usr/include/machine/endian_machdep.h
+.if	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "alpha")   || \
+	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "arm26")   || \
+	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "arm32")   || \
+	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386")    || \
+	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "mipsel")  || \
+	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "ns32k")   || \
+	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "vax") 
+TARGET_ENDIANNESS?= -L
+.elif	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "m68k")    || \
+	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "mipseb")  || \
+	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "powerpc") || \
+	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "sparc")   || \
+	(${MACHINE_ARCH} == "sparc64")
+TARGET_ENDIANNESS?= -B
 .else
-TARGET_ENDIANNESS=
-.endif
-
-.if ${TARGET_ENDIANNESS} == "_LITTLE_ENDIAN"
-TARGET_ENDIANNESS= -L
-.elif ${TARGET_ENDIANNESS} == "_BIG_ENDIAN"
-TARGET_ENDIANNESS= -B
-.else
+# XXX sh3 should be split into sh3eb and sh3el
 TARGET_ENDIANNESS?=
 .endif