Subject: Re: IPv6 and who
To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <email@example.com>
From: Bill Sommerfeld <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/12/2000 11:18:06
> there were couple of comments, including:
> - just change UT_HOSTSIZE (no backward compat)
> - use extra plaintext file based on other OS's practice
> - ...
> and there seem to be no consensus.
- define an API!
- use some other format other than a binary file of fixed-length
records (that's just so COBOL) so that we won't have to grow the
size again later.
- allow for increased username and line size as well as hostname size.
- possibly log other parameters?