Subject: Re: setting and using progname.
To: None <>
From: Johan Danielsson <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 10/06/2000 02:39:20
Greywolf <> writes:

> What's wrong with '?:' ?  It's perfectly good code and not silly at
> all.  If anything, it's more concise for a simple test.

But if the code gets a lot more complicated than x ? y : z, it gets
very hard to read.