Subject: whois documentation issues
To: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
Date: 10/02/2000 02:36:39
[ moved to tech-userlevel from source-changes ]
In message <Pine.NEB.4.21.0010011138000.10983-100000@localhost>, David Brownlee
> Maybe some of the options could be documented in whois.1?
That sounds reasonable, I don't have the time right now.
Would you care to do so or file a PR?
If so, please note that the DESCRIPTION of whois is rather incorrect,
and I suppose some flames should fall upon the person who
integrated the RIPE whois (hrmm..tron -- why was that done?). That is:
| whois searches for an object in the RIPE Network Management database.
| The key can be either a name (such as "Karrenberg"),a nic-handle (such as
| "DK58"), a network number ("220.127.116.11/24") or a domain name
But of course, this is not right. Though we use the RIPE whois
client, we set the default server to the traditional default,
which only allows looking up information in the InterNIC's database
(or ICANN's, mumble mumble), but certainly not the RIPE database.
there's other relatively egregious stuff in there...
(if you don't want to do this, I'll file a PR at my earliest convenience.)
I think it'd be perfectly reasonable to document
whois.internic.net authoritative for all icann domains?
whois.arin.net ARIN network number assignments.
whois.ripe.net RIPE domains, assignments,& routing info.
whois.ra.net Merit/IRR routing info
whois.geektools.com recursing proxies that query internic.net
whois.fucknsi.com aka and then more -- or perhaps use rwhois?
pallas.eruditorum.org mechanism is unclear
whois.opensrs.net same as above, but also authoritative for
whois.networksolutions.com the Internic's server for their own domain
that's off the top of my head.
> -- www.netbsd.org: A pmap for every occasion --
>On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, John Hawkinson wrote:
>> Module Name: basesrc
>> Committed By: jhawk
>> Date: Sat Sep 30 14:05:49 UTC 2000
>> Modified Files:
>> basesrc/usr.bin/whois: whois.c
>> Log Message:
>> Return to whois.internic.net.
>> whois.networksolutions.com is just wrong -- it only returns information
>> for Network Solutions domains.
>> whois.opensrs.net is a bit better -- it returns information for OpenSRS
>> domains, and otherwise recurses to the correct whois server for other
>> domains -- unfortunately it is not canonical, and cannot be construed as
>> "correct." Other recursing proxies include whois.geektools.com and pallas.
>> eruditorum.org, neither of which is "official" either.
>> For good or for ill, we go back to whois.internic.net, which is the canonica
>> source for this information.
>> To generate a diff of this commit:
>> cvs rdiff -r1.13 -r1.14 basesrc/usr.bin/whois/whois.c