Subject: Re: bin/10985 (skel files)
To: David Brownlee <abs@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Simon Burge <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 10/01/2000 20:59:58
You can set the skeleton directory to something that is empty. I guess
we could also make a new option, say -K (opposite of -k) which says
ignore the skeleton directory, along with a setting that can be saved in
/etc/usermgmt.conf (say copy_skel_dir {true,false}).
Simon.
--
David Brownlee wrote:
> I'd prefer to see the dotfiles in /usr/share/examples/skel -
> I tend to leave defaults in /etc/csh.* and create homedirs without
> any dotfiles.
>
> If we do go ahead with this, is there a way to tell useradd on a
> stock system to create the home directory without populating it
> with any files. (short of deleting /etc/skel).
>
> David/absolute
> -- www.netbsd.org: A pmap for every occasion --
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Simon Burge wrote:
>
> > Ok,
> >
> > So we're all pretty much agreed on putting the skel files in /etc/skel,
> > and leaving out /usr/share altogether (ie, both /usr/share/skel and
> > /usr/share/examples/usermgmt go the way of the bit-bucket)? And that
> > the skel files are part of the "etc" set and don't get overwritten by a
> > "make build" or "make install"?
--
Simon Burge <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
NetBSD Sales, Support and Service: http://www.wasabisystems.com/