Subject: Re: bin/10985 (skel files)
To: Simon Burge <>
From: Jaromír Dolecek <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 09/29/2000 09:11:40
Simon Burge wrote:
> Hmm, I'd tend towards /etc/skel - all of /usr/share should be shareable
> amongst a cluster of machines, and that may not be possible for whatever
> reasons.

I think those files should be put in /etc/skel, as well.

The upgrade issue is actually the same with /etc/alias, /etc/rtadvd.conf
and whole bunch of other files in /etc.

Jaromir Dolecek <>
@@@@  Wanna a real operating system ? Go and get NetBSD, damn!  @@@@