Subject: Re: bin/10985 (skel files)
To: Simon Burge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jaromír Dolecek <email@example.com>
Date: 09/29/2000 09:11:40
Simon Burge wrote:
> Hmm, I'd tend towards /etc/skel - all of /usr/share should be shareable
> amongst a cluster of machines, and that may not be possible for whatever
I think those files should be put in /etc/skel, as well.
The upgrade issue is actually the same with /etc/alias, /etc/rtadvd.conf
and whole bunch of other files in /etc.
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> http://www.ics.muni.cz/~dolecek/
@@@@ Wanna a real operating system ? Go and get NetBSD, damn! @@@@