On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 07:34:14PM +0200, Johan Danielsson wrote:

 > In the file case it's quite obvious what they mean, close is close,
 > and destroy is unlink. If you can only get hold of a memory cache by
 > doing gen_new, it's also quite obvious that close and destroy mean the
 > same thing (otherwise close would leak memory). This will of course
 > have to change if you can resolve memory cache names.

Ok, I have addressed this, along with the use of temp files (using
ASCII representation of pointers, per your suggestion -- in resolve,
"dead" MCC IDs cannot be resolved, so the pointers are unique enough).

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>