Subject: Re: CVS commit: basesrc
To: Johan Danielsson <email@example.com>
From: Jason R Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/10/2000 11:57:51
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 07:34:14PM +0200, Johan Danielsson wrote:
> In the file case it's quite obvious what they mean, close is close,
> and destroy is unlink. If you can only get hold of a memory cache by
> doing gen_new, it's also quite obvious that close and destroy mean the
> same thing (otherwise close would leak memory). This will of course
> have to change if you can resolve memory cache names.
Ok, I have addressed this, along with the use of temp files (using
ASCII representation of pointers, per your suggestion -- in resolve,
"dead" MCC IDs cannot be resolved, so the pointers are unique enough).
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>