Subject: Re: Suggestion: inclusion of the truncate(1) utility into the tree
To: Kevin P. Neal <email@example.com>
From: Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/24/2000 12:27:30
>> >Wouldn't it be "more portable" if xargs was updated to be more complete?
>> >HP-UX xargs allows for the substitution of a string with the input
>> >given to xargs. The string to be substituted can be specified with an
>> >additional argument.
>> >find foo -type f -name \*.bar | xargs -iBAZ mv BAZ otherthere
>> >As near as I can tell offhand, GNU and HP-UX xargs support this.
>> wouldn't that cause one execution per argument? if so, i'd be just as
>> well off doing something like:
>> find foo -type f -name \*.bar | \
>> sh -c 'while read i; do mv $i otherthere; done'
>Hmmm. Looks like you are correct, it does cause one execution per argument.
>That's a performance lose, but xargs is still more portable than a new
a xargs that does this or the cp/mv that does that...either way it's
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
email@example.com * "ah! i see you have the internet
firstname.lastname@example.org (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
email@example.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."