Subject: Re: sysv ps(1) implementation [was: ps(1) sysv silliness]
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com>
From: Wolfgang Solfrank <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/08/2000 17:01:45
while I'm not sure whether I like this sysv-ish ps, this one caught my
> I would really like for people to be able to do something like
> 'alias ps ps-sysv' so that they can just type "ps -<sysv opts>"
> and the right thing happens - just looking for ps-sysv in __progname
> wont work in this situation.
Why not? Looks like one of us must be confused here... Can you explain?
ws@TooLs.DE Wolfgang Solfrank, TooLs GmbH +49-228-985800