Subject: Re: chown/chgrp problem: is "." a separator or part of a name ?
To: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
From: Darren Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/07/2000 10:55:33
In some email I received from Perry E. Metzger, sie wrote:
> Darren Reed <email@example.com> writes:
> > Whilst looking through the PR's currently open, I came across one where
> > a person was attempting to chown a file to a user where the username was
> > made up of a ".". Easy to deal with ? Maybe.
> > Consider that a username might be "foo.bar", "foo", "bar" and a group
> > name to match each of those.
> > If I do "chown foo.bar /tmp/foryou" what should happen ?
> > Is the best option, in this case, to simply bail out because the user
> > is not being clear about what they want to do ?
> There are two possibilities here. The current docs we have don't even
> indicate that "." still works. In theory, we could perhaps just rip it
> Or, of course, we could just rip it out.
There are already #ifdef's in chown.c to disable use of '.' as a user/group