Subject: Re: Shell behaviour regarding PATH
To: NetBSD Userlevel Technical Discussion List <email@example.com>
From: Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/09/2000 17:12:59
>User's are already confused by naming conflicts when "." doesn't come
>first in their $PATH. Adding relative sub-directory searching to $PATH
>searches would, from what I've seen in my experience, cause major
relative subdirectory searching does work fine. i even found a good
case for it once, when i was writing/testing/debugging a few similar
sets of tools. just put the stuff you're playing with in ./bin and
put bin in your path and *presto* you can use a different set of tools
depending on where you are.
worked fine. not for everyday consumption, of course, and certainly
confusing to people who don't understand it.
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
email@example.com * "ah! i see you have the internet
firstname.lastname@example.org (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
email@example.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."