Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: /etc/rc, /etc/init.d/*, ...
To: Luke Mewburn <email@example.com>
From: Eduardo E. Horvath <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/01/1999 09:08:09
I like it. One comment though:
> b) /etc/init.d/
> This contains files - one for each function to execute on
> startup - which can either be invoked directly or used to
> generate /etc/rc (via mkrc).
> Currently there are 75 scripts in /etc/init.d.
> NOTE: During development this directory was called `/etc/rc.d'.
> It was changed to `/etc/init.d' because:
> a) prior art (cf. SYSV), and people are used to running
> /etc/init.d/foo start
> b) `completion-conflict-with-rc.d' asthetics :-)
> If there's a strong argument for /etc/rc.d over
> /etc/init.d, we could rename it to /etc/rc.d.
Can the scripts in `/etc/init.d' be invoked directly, as in
`/etc/init.d/nfs stop'? This is not clear as the example scripts do
not seem to be directly executable.
If not, i.e. you need to run some interpreter on them explicitly, I
would not use the `/etc/init.d' name as that will add confusion.
Eduardo Horvath email@example.com
"I need to find a pithy new quote." -- me