Subject: Re: update(8)
To: None <hwr@pilhuhn.de>
From: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 11/25/1999 00:52:36
	I believe the trickle-sync changes are independent from the	
	softdep, (so update dies even without softdep :)


		David/absolute

On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:

> Simon Burge wrote:
> |I'm going through the install tools deleting references to update(8),
> |and notice that we still build and install it.  Is this right or an
> |oversight?
> 
> I think update is still needed for systems that don't use softupdates
> So as long as softupdates can be disabled, we should build update.
> Or am I totally wrong?
> 
> --
>           See <a href="http://www.netbsd.org">NetBSD</a> for a multiplatform OS
> Koennen wir jetzt die Prinzipienreiterei lassen und uns wieder den
> wirklich wichtigen Dingen zuwenden?
>                                  -- Tilman Schmidt in de.admin.news.groups
>