Subject: Re: libm detritus
To: Danny Thomas <D.Thomas@vthrc.uq.edu.au>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com>
Date: 11/09/1999 11:26:38
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 11:44:59AM +1000, Danny Thomas wrote:
> Should the 'f' versions be moved from libm to libc ?
> [the existing ones in libc are in the arch-specific part of libc, though a
> brief eyeball showed no arch-specific diffs. Should the 'f' version go
> alongside in the arch sub-directory?]
Uhm, if I recall right, at least m68k has (and I would be very surprised, if
VAX had not) assembler versions of them.
* Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from
smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of
smart terminals. -- firstname.lastname@example.org (obscurity)