Subject: Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2))
To: Michael Richardson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Daniel C. Sobral <email@example.com>
Date: 07/15/1999 13:42:49
Michael Richardson wrote:
> No, I don't agree.
> This is a biggest argument against solving the overcommit situation with
> SIGKILL. I have no problem with overcommit as a concept, I have a problem
> with being unable to keep my possibly big processes (X, rpc.nisd,
> etc. depending on cicumstances) from being victims.
It is no more difficult to protect big processes than it is to
create user limits.
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
"Would you like to go out with me?"
"I'd love to."
"Oh, well, n... err... would you?... ahh... huh... what do I do