Subject: Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2))
To: Sergey Babkin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Daniel C. Sobral <email@example.com>
Date: 07/15/1999 13:01:23
Sergey Babkin wrote:
> > It would be nice to have a way to indicate that, a la SIGDANGER.
> Another option may be to add something like "importance classes".
> Suppose we assign an one-byte "importance level" to each process.
> When we get out of swap we start killing processes with the lowest
> importance level. This seems to be both easy to implement and
> a rather robust solution.
This is as easy to do as setting limits, which has the added benefit
of not having any process killed.
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
"Would you like to go out with me?"
"I'd love to."
"Oh, well, n... err... would you?... ahh... huh... what do I do