Subject: re: PR#3615 status...
To: Matthew Orgass <email@example.com>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/21/1999 12:08:54
What is the status of PR#3615?
I just noticed that a similar condition happens in 1.4_ALPHA when you
try to mount something under a symlink. umount resolves the path, but
It seems to me that mount should resolve the path, since the resolved
path is where it is actually mounted. Would this be acceptable?
it seems that (a) mount should be resolve the path and (b) umount should
be able to unmount relative paths if they *are* mounted, perhaps via some
switch to disable path resolution before calling unmount()... i think.