On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 06:12:55PM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> 
> Besides, I think one of the things I blue-sky'ed about in conjunction
> with this thread was a properly working union filesystem so that the
> workstation could have only a minimum of necessary files locally and the
> rest would appear transparently through a union mount of a network
> filesystem, just as Plan 9's bind scheme works.

Ah....

you didnt mention that before. Now, if you, or somebody else, would make
unionfs or union mounts working, we could do a lot of things differently.

	-is