Matthias Scheler wrote:
> In article <199804270752.JAA02464@saruman.ics.muni.cz>,
> 	Jaromir Dolecek <dolecek@ics.muni.cz> writes:
> > In python package's PLIST-md.{shared|static}, there is explicit
> > @unexec rm -rf %D/lib/python1.5
> 
> What a clumsy hack. But you are right it'll work.

It's about the best one can do -- people might install some modules
themselves, not via packages.

As I think about it, maybe it would be better to not do the rm -rf
and let pkg_delete barf on the extra files -- so user/installer
will be notified there are some extra files one need to remove/whatever.

> 
> BTW: why are you ignoring my "Reply-To"?

I'm NOT ignoring it ;) I've correctly replied to tech-userlevel@NetBSD.org
(besides netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org). I though it got through, but 
it seems it hasn't :(

-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <dolecek@ics.muni.cz>	http://www.ics.muni.cz/~dolecek/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is better never to have been born.  But who among us has such luck?
One in a million, perhaps.