Subject: Re: What macro should used to enable profiling
To: J.T. Conklin <jtc@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Frank van der Linden <email@example.com>
Date: 11/14/1996 12:59:38
Quoting J.T. Conklin,
> One quick hack would be to have config define PROF in addition to
> GPROF. A more extensive change would be to change current uses of
> PROF to GPROF.
> I favor the latter approach, as the profile instrumentation we emit is
> for "gprof" not "prof". If we hijack "PROF" for gprof, what should be
> used if someone decides to contribute support for the traditional flat
> "prof" profiling in the future.
I think the latter is the best, it may be a little more work, but
at least it cleans things up.
I can't think of any big problems with this, and apparently, neither can
other people, so.. let's do it?